[Dowly]

Originally Posted by Mittelwaechter

^^ This is your high quality debunking?




Please folks: watch this clip, it's worth it:



These people interview witnesses of the Pentagon event.
It is well done and I guess no one aboard can ask for more evidence from privat investigators.

I'm not going to touch all of the video as a lot of it is just repeating the already debunked material.
But there are few less "popular" things in it I'd like to get to.

1. Robert Balsamo's G-force calculations.
Are wrong. See here: http://www.cesura17.net/~will/Epheme.../balsamo2.html

2. Edward Paik's eyewitness statement.
He seems to be unsure of the flight path. He says the plane clipped the tower you see on the right
side in the video. That would put the flight path way to the south side of Navy Annex.

In 2010 interview, he says he was inside when the plane flew past.

Ed Paik: [Ed is standing in front of the counter] “Shinki sitting over there, I’m standing up here. We’d been talking about the Twin Towers. And then we heard about- the big sound. And then I just look out like this [bends over, ducking and turning head to look out the front window] and then aircraft- I can hear- black, big wing as it goes- heading to that way [motions with arm, sweeping from West to East, roughly parallel to Columbia Pike]
Erik Larson: “So- were you outside when it happened?”
Ed: “After that- I saw it, and after that I go out.”
Erik: “So, you were inside when the plane flew over.”
Ed: “Yeah- flew this way.” [indicates path with his hand, West to East, parallel to Columbia Pike, again]
Erik: “OK. But you were looking outside the window.”
Ed: [bends head down, and points outside] “Looking outside here.”

Source:

Also, in another interview from 2006, conducted by "truthers" I might add, he says he was inside:


And lastly, a quote from Clark Ranke, founder of CitizenInvestigationTeam (you know, the makers of the video you posted):

You can't use a witness to extrapolate what you want regarding the placement of the plane in an area that they would not even be able to witness from their location! That is spin and is deceptive.

So, if Ed Paik was inside, as he says he was in 2 out of 3 interviews, then how could he be a reliable eyewitness when it comes to figuring out the flight path of Flight 77?


I might do a few more points later on, not that it'll convince you of anything.