You are moving in causal circles, gentlemen.
You ask me why I doubt, you ask for valid questions concerning 9/11 and for my opinion on your comments and answers, but you are bored to answer "a truther's" doubts, questions and comments.
Does it make sense?
As I said before you may have to convince yourself again to believe the official claims by repeating them.
I think you have to feel the approval, the legitimation of the majority, to ensure yourself to support the right side.
So you feel reassured, you back each other and you applaud yourself. Additionally there may be some joy in supporting the authorities.
You constantly ask me for evidence. Questions need no evidence, but claims do. If the claims are intransparent or doubtable they are to be questioned.
If they are not - like my 'black hat operations stay behind the scenes commonly' claim - asking for evidence is just infantile, shows the lack of a position or is just intentional trolling.
There are thousands of truther trolls out there. With doubtable evidence they are not better than the officials offering doubtable evidence.
This group behaviour of mutual assurance, this encouraging each other, the feeling to support a noble cause are similar motivators to the ones described above.
Again, I don't consider me to be a truther. I don't have to believe all the truther claims as I don't have to doubt all official claims.
There is much nonsense to find out there. And there is some official evidence for claims of the believers.
But there are also serious concerns and questions by serious scientists, experts and regulars, who just want to find the causes, the real connections, the so called truth.
I show you a picture of the original airplane, carrying some object attached to its fuselage, simply recognizable with our senses - evident!
You show me a picture of an airplane of the same type, but without the attached object - simply recognizable with our senses - and you call it evidence.
This is on the level of the thousand truther trolls. Doesn't it make you a debunker troll?
It simply disqualifies you. You refuse to deal with the obvious and retreat into your comfort zone.
Mainstream is not stupid by default, but it isn't correct either. It's an easy chair, commonly provided by some interested party.
Don't mix gameplay, brain food, entertainment, critical analysis of a situation, alternative interpretation of an issue with serious questions on doubtable claims.
Irony, cynism, stilistic writing, context, personality etc. are to be considered by judging the intentions of a comment. This may be difficult, especially through language barriers.
Damn, I didn't even want to discuss 9/11.
|