Quote:
Originally Posted by CaptainHaplo
A private entity doing what it wants with what it controls is hardly a "technicality". Someone breaking into your home, eating your food, loading your stuff into your car and driving away with it is stealing only because of the "technicality" that they don't have a right to do so. What private rights - based on ownership of property - do you really think should not apply?
Internet use in the US is used by almost every citizen - perhaps it should be purged to make it religiously neutral? Heck, streets are public - should churches not be allowed to be seen from the street, otherwise a public road with only a protestant church on it are no longer "neutral". How far will you go to eradicate the rights of a private entity to be religious in or on its own "property"?
|
You dominionists crack me up with your strawman arguments. There is no reason that currency representing the United States of America should be bearing 'In God We Trust'. There was unbridled religious freedom before the words were placed, there will be unbridled religious freedom after they are removed. Enough with this nonsense.
Quote:
That is the technicality.
You choose to use it - that is your choice. Don't like what a private enterprise does, don't use what they own. Or do you, by virtue of owning a car, have a right to tell the car manufacturer how they will advertise, what there logo must be, etc?
|
My Lexus does not bear any official seal of the United States of America. Poor argument for a poor position.
Quote:
|
True - and they can choose to listen to you - or not - as they please. They can - and have so far - chosen to NOT be "religiously neutral".
|
And that is wrong. And I have every right to agitate about it until it is changed. Your consent is neither sought nor required. But it does more or less lay your plans bare, does it not?
