I'm saying that a massacre not committed by chemicals but machetes or bullets is not any nicier.
In acts like here, bullets would be used without discriminating between civilian and combatant either. That's why we call such things not a battle, but a massacre.
So what i am pointing at is our hypocrisy when arranging ourselves with slaughtering done with bullets or machetes - but we yell when they use chemicals.
Some people in the West even want us actively supporting the so-called "rebels". But what if they have done this latest massacre, like they have done others before, like their counterparts in Assad's hordes? Not to mention that the majority of these "rebels" factions are ultra-fundamentalist and propose "values" that any civilised person would avoid at all cost to get associated with?
__________________
If you feel nuts, consult an expert.
|