All that I will say is that my observations are based from 1995 technology. What has been completed in the 11 years, who knows, but that is how we did it back then.
If you have a strong NB signal with different frequencies then the weak NB signal of a different platform, the computer will always go for the strong one. In RL, that is why we had the "Top Secret" red book...we had to do it ourselves...look up what the "rouge" frequency was of the weak signal because more than likely, it was a threat.
All of these people that complain about a traffic heavy BB or NB need to stop complaining because that is what it was like in RL...trackers moving from one line to another because they overlapped. I can remember getting yelled at by the instructor during our training because I wasn't paying close enough attention to the combined track of two contacts. They were so close that I couldn't tell which was which and had to basically sit on them until they moved farther apart.
Bellman, for the most part, the sounds are "close" to what it is in RL. Granted, I miss being able to hear the hull popping of a submarine or the actual cavitation being produced. Shoot...I still tap my fingers trying to get a turn count. :rotfl:
When you say "can he be more specific in identification?", I admit that I'm a little confused. In RL, we could tell if something had a "quirk" that seperated it from the class of boat/ship...bad shaft seals, messed up propellor, etc.
|