Quote:
Originally Posted by Tribesman
That is where you are going wrong.
The testimony she gave gives the "probably" since it is those other times she is in trouble over as it was those other times she is accused of.
Namely at work in the period 2005-2010, that is what hung her out to dry, not a conversation with her husband in the 1980s.
Not at all, context is everything.
|
I'm not contesting what was said by Deen. The case made it to litigation because there is enough to warrant one under the law. I'm not "wrong" with contention of what has transpired as a result of speaking the truth during her deposition. I'm having issue with the method of crushing everything she invested in for simply stating the truth. Those that have taken the moral high road might best take a look at their past indiscretions. It is a witch hunt and cash grab.
Context is everything only when a caucasian uses the word. Double standard.