Quote:
Originally Posted by Tribesman
No they didn't, they ruled that the formula used to apply Section 5 was out of date.
So they issue no ruling on section 5 but ruled that section 4(b) was unconstitutional unless it is updated.
|
Of course, you would jump on a typo. 4 not 5* They did say it was unconstitutional, read the decision.
http://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions...12-96_6k47.pdf