Quote:
Originally Posted by Tribesman
Is it?
If someone has claimed to be a legal expert can it not be mentioned when a legal issue is being discussed?
|
As I've told him many times, it's not what you say, it's how you say it. You might not want to keep arguing about this if you don't want to make it worse.
Quote:
It might be insulting if he showed he did know what the topic was and I called him oblivious of it as that would clearly be a false statement which woud be insulting.
ignorant, unaware, oblivious, unknowing, nescient, bewildered, uninformed....all the same as clueless. Which are insulting and which are not?
|
All of them. It's not debating, it's name-calling. Either debate the topic properly and show where he's wrong, or discuss it like a gentleman.
From the rules:
Quote:
|
The Radio Room forum is not the place for flaming, spewing, or otherwise mouthing off. We do not allow posts where people are called idiots, morons, etc.
|
Quote:
|
Or is it all down to your random interpretation depending on the quirk of the day?
|
Nothing random about it. It's all about the name-calling. Stop it.
Quote:
Really?
And what is offensive in that passage?
"irrelevant hot air" perhaps?
|
First, calling him "bubbles". Part of your tactic seems to be to pervert peoples' names in a manner designed to insult. And yes, saying that everything he wrote is "irrelevant hot air" is an insult. If you take the time to prove it so, then it's proven. If you just say it, it's meaningless. Again, you say it in intentionally provocative ways. That is close to trolling again.