[Skybird]

In my thinking ther eis no unlimited freedom of movement. You have that in ground/land that is not possessed by somebody. If you want to move on or thorugh land or on streets owed by soembody, you have to ask the owner for permission.

In an ideal world, it would be private peple possessing the land, the road build on it, and it would be them deciding whether a road would be build at all. Unfortunately the democratic polit-mafia has destroyed that ideal. People no longer have the right to act in full proprietary rights over their property, and roads have been enforced to reach them and to make them object of blackmailing them for protection money. The so-called "state" now owns roads which are build by these protection moneys. And for that reason alone the "state" enforces migration being allowed to flow on these roads, no matter whether the natives having land bordering these roads want that or not.

It's all a very sick and criminal system. And the state-arrangement has enforced this to allow antisocial parasites - politicians and administrators - to live at the cost of the community and command it where their commanding is not needed and the local people in a place all by themselves could decide in which way they cooperate and push an traffic infrastructure across their property. Why people in Hamburg are taxed in order to pay for a road in Bavaria, is beyond me. The new road through that Bavarian village should be decided on and payed for exclusively by those sharing a border with it or needing to allow it leading over their property. How can a state own ground and land and property? The state is - nothing but a hypothetical construction claimed by politicians and profiteers to be the latest dress of the kind where the kind inf act already walks naked.

The right and guarantee for private property is the basis of anything worth to be called an order based on the principle of freedom. That's why the communist utopia, where nobody owns anything but all own everything, necessarily will lead, always, to centralised dictatorship and totalitarianism, as well overboarding bureaucracy and a phlegmatic attitude in people where nobody feels responsible for anything anymore but all make claims for what they demand, and instead everybody must improvise in a system that increasingly rots and falls apart. It'S a human basic truth: we care more for what is ours and what is our family and property,m than for what is not ours, and is not our family or tribe. They can try social engineering as much as they want, those leftist world-improving wannabe tyrants - they will fail, every time. Reality and natural law never bend to ideological demands.

If somebody thinks this all is a bit far-fetched or disconnected from the thread, he better thinks again.