[Skybird]

Tchocky, Clintons involvement in prohibiting reinforcements to the embassy and her demand that no security measures worth the name are to be run there, has been reported already months ago. Use the search button, I either ran a dedicated thread on that or at least linked some articles in some threads's reply of mine.

There is involvement - at the very top of the hierarchy. I mean only the president is above her, right!?

What we see now is a hedging and squirming of her group, because she wants to become the next president. And for that mission, such a total failure like over the Benghazi terror attack does not really serve as a recommendation. Some Islamic thug may have pulled the trigger and ran the torturing of Americans during that plot (qhich was coming with an early warning note, btw.) - but the responsibility to leave the victims exposed and unprotected and to ignore the warnings, is Clinton's.

The early warnings of the intel srvrices hardly were ordered by Obama, he hardly told them to produce the kind of evidence and clues he needed to justify any action, like Bush had instructed the CIA to construct a case against Hussein, which they did, and later, when the blame game began, the CIA was left alone and Bush hid behind it. The early warnings from Benghazi do not compare to that kind of plot. What various subordinate instances now seem to have been told - last but not least by Clinton -, is to not reveal the truth behind the terror attack. And it seems that this time the CIA was no easily complying with that, at least internally.