I see what you are saying Respenus, however it is aimed in the wrong direction.
There are a multitude of examples on this forum covering everything from ballons or water to toys religion voting and immigration.
What you have is someone who takes the latset rant from Ganley, Farange or Condell and insists it is true without looking at the details and then still insists it is true after all the details have been posted which show it to be false.
It even happens with him posting links to Daily Fail stories where the story he is posting finishes up by saying the story isn't true.
So you are correct that some people go into one without looking deeply(or even briefly) at the subject matter, but the person you are trying to defend just happens to frequently be a prime example of that very thing you are complaining about.
|