Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Gizzmoe
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by GT182
Soulcommander is not making up definitions! They are coming from someone else that is using the terms, whether they make them up or not. It's NOT important.
|
Let me get this right, the 1-6 list and the idea to call it "the definition of a Trojankit" didn´t come from ThirteenthHouR or SC? |
Lets get something clear here.
Do you use the term Rootkit?
Are you aware that before Mark coined the phrase and or definition. The term did not exist previously?
Now as the person who has been posting fixes concerning a number of these SF related issues on the net. I thought it important that there should be single word which can be referenced, that would not subject peeps to litigation and would be very clear and concise as to what it refers to.
With Marks Rootkit being similar in some respect, the Term Kit was kept, however with this also relating to Ringo 0 access. Trojan Gateway is at the forefront.
Hence 'TrojanKit'.
"This prevents the industry from saying, but our software is not a rootkit" , "Marks definition says so" or words to that effect. In much the same way as you have said in previous posts about SF.
In other words it puts to bed that silly argument.
It may be possible that in future they will say the same about TrojanKits after they have resorted to some other fool idea for copy protection. However we will cross that Bridge when we come to it.