Just to check for understanding.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Wreford-Brown
1. RndMidPat=0 means that this particular entry in sabotage will not be applied mid-patrol.
2. This particular entry in sabotage may be applied mid-patrol.
3. I believe this is to do with when you load the game. SH3 Commander is an external engine therefore should not be able to affect the game whilst you are playing it (SH3 loads all game data on first load, therefore it can't have an effect on the game files mid-play). If you are loading a new game in port then it will roll a dice for each RndMidPat=0 entry plus every RndMidPat=1 entry. If you're loading a mid-patrol save then it will only roll a dice for each RndMidPat=1 entry.
|
It seems from these two statements that HEMISENT's post is incorrect. What you have stated here makes more sense, and seems to fit into my anecdotal observations as well. So I think that it is safe to assume that everything you have said here is true.
Quote:
4. If you don't rollback SH3 Commander then the malfunction or sabotage remains in place... forever. This is because it has rewritten the game files and rollback prevents it from deleting the changes.
5. No - rollback deletes all previous changes to the files so I don't see how it can remember old problems. This is part of the 'save game and reload and your crew may have solved the problem' answer.
Can anyone check me on these?
|
I am assuming by forever you mean until the end of the patrol (or your u-boat is sunk, as that counts as forever, I guess

)?
In light of your answer to #5, can anyone confirm this? From everything I can tell, it seems that how the rollback works would imply what you say.
I'd also like to know if it applies between careers. For example, I'm in career #1 with a permanent condition. I save/exit and start playing career #2. If I go back to career #1, will the permanent condition still be in place?
Generally, incorporating a mod that would explicitly require that you do not roll back SH3 Commander is a worrisome mod indeed.

If I was to consider doing this further, I would need some absolute confirmation of which is the case.