I know.
You called me that recently, but hey I can live with that risk
Easily and frequently demonstrated.
On the one extreme you have the "its the guns".
You can drag them to reality where they agree its some guns, some people, those people, not those people, not those guns, not that situation.
Then they get frightened and fall back to "its the guns"
On the other extreme you have the "no restrictions"
Likewise you can drag them to reality where they agree to these restrictions, those restrictions, these people, those people, those situations.
Then they get frightened and fall back to "no restrictions".
Both extremes manage to destroy their own arguements, but still run away to try and cling to them again and again.
Not really since the two extremes are shooting so far beyond their targets the flak the middle gets is just harmless noise.
Quite a comical process really isn't it.
