Quote:
Originally Posted by Tribesman
Google and facebook are good tools for insurance companies to reject claims, the "like" button is magic.
|
Really?
I have liked the plague on facebook, now I fear my medical insurance might deny treatment in case i catch it.
An honest question, nonetheless: do you know a case where the companies were succesfull with a rejection based on a like-click, even in court?
However my original statement considering the like-button, was about a practice, mentioned for example in this article:
https://www.datenschutzzentrum.de/pr...acebook-en.htm
This is why websites who care about data protection, hide google+/facebook crap, untill the user explicitly agrees to show them.
For anyone interested, here is a javascript example, by the German computer mag c't:
http://www.heise.de/extras/socialshareprivacy/ (site is in GErman, however code is universal
)
Quote:
Originally Posted by the_tyrant
Seriously, please understand that anything you put on a server that is not yours is no longer yours.
|
Repeating the same argument twice on one page, does not change the fact that the law and people who care about data protection see it different.
Please check what's true:
( ) you have read the article
( ) you know the difference between the two proposed drafts
( ) you know the data protection laws of at least one EU member state
( ) you know what 'consent' and 'revoking consent' means
Judging from your statements I can't see any of this. In case you check all 4 boxes, we can have an open debate about the proposed law. Cheers!