Quote:
Originally Posted by TarJak
This is meant to be a serious discussion on the law and not an argument for or against the bearing of arms as that right is already understood.
|
I started off at the beginning writing a lengthy post, but found myself unable to stay within that parameter. It looks like I wasn't the only one.
As for the original question of what do we think would be an acceptable limit in the eyes of the Judiciary, I think that changes just as often as the judiciary does. Presidents appoint justices who feel as they do politically. Of course sometimes they get a nasty surprise when push comes to shove, but for the most part Supreme Court justices seem to follow party lines just as much as anyone else in Washington.