Quote:
Originally Posted by Takeda Shingen
What data? Am I to take your word for it? Would you like me to get into what exactly your word is worth around here?
|
You are expected to read and to digest what is written, if you fail to do do so then it is you who is at fault and you should not be complaining because you have not understood.
Quote:
|
Right now, anything would be better than what you are giving us, which is nothing. Well, not nothing, I'm getting a lot of rude remarks and emoticons, which may impress yubba but you have been around long enough to know that it won't fly with me. So, again, where are your facts?
|
Facts?
Lets see. Take a post you complained about.
1 It is totally misleading.
2 Not outlawed then.
3 Specify the legislation of whim or stand exposed in your bull.
4 Wow, if you are released on bail they can set bail conditions relative to the charges and the individual, whoda thunkit eh?
5 Steve already tried to defend that line of bull last time you spouted it. He came up with the amazing total of one single person in Florida calling for such a thing.
Show one line that is not factual.
Or considering the claim you made about it show one line which does not counter the line it was responding to.
3 of course is slightly different as that is a question for someone to provide the legislation of "whim" they say covers firearms.
5 is a rather good example, as that was someone else providing the data but not reading it and also not managing to notice the difference in what he was claiming and what I and his data was saying.
It also provides an example of August again parroting something which has already been shown as false.