Quote:
Originally Posted by Tribesman
Item 1. last year
Item 2. 2011
Item 3. 2009
Item 4. 2007
The figures don't compute do they, they are all different.
As a bonus they all use different sources as well as different years and each source uses different methods for counting.
Simple isn't it.
Though the 2009 figures are the most dubious source due to their nature and what they are trying to portray over a 12 year period.
|
None of that makes any sense at all, nor does it have any citation. Stop trolling. Last warning.
The Management