If the infos are in printed or digital form makes no difference regarding its truth, though I prefer holding a big book in a comfy chair to reading long texts on a monitor.
However the biggest annoyance regarding the web is often the lack of source material. Hell, there are even news sites out there where they don't show a date in the article, unusuable for serious research.
Still too often, (news) sites show a disregard for the hyperlink abilities of the net. When I read something about say a speech, I am one of those guys who want to dig deeper when it interests me. Would it kill the journalists to link to the original speech?
Same goes about articles about scientific papers. Thanks, journalists for editing the infos and explaining discoveries to the public, but put a freaking link at least to the abstract! This way the interested reader can check out how much truth the article contains and how much is just exaggeration to create "news".
@Platapus: here are two pages full of porn which you'll certainly appreciate:
http://www.flavorwire.com/254434/the...s-in-the-world
http://www.flavorwire.com/346427/dre...-who-love-them
