Quote:
Originally Posted by Randomizer
His statement highlights one fundamental flaw in his religious dogma. If his god has a hand in conception (or indeed "most things" as stated above), what does he not have a hand in? How can his god have responsibility for one (conception) without taking ownership for the other (rape)?
|
The misinterpretation here is that God has a hand in conception. In other words, it was His will that it happened. Humans have free will, given to them by God. God does not interfere with that free will, right or wrong. God is not responsible for either the rape or the conception. One is a crime and the other is biology.
Quote:
|
This clown (Mourdock) is just another American Taliban who's knowledge of biology and empathy for women in general is essentially non-existent.
|
Can't disagree with that.