Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Konovalov
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Skybird
No, it must be far more massive.
|
I suspect by saying a "big war" Abraham implied not a ground invasion such as like Iraq but he can clarify on that. |
Right. Perhaps with some special forces. on the ground, but no full scale invasion. It should be clear that the West - if not the world - has an issue with the Iranian nuclear program as it is executed and not with the Iranian people. Furthermore, I think that destroying only deeply covered or remote facilities would avoid "collateral damage" of innocent civilians and would be clear enough a message of the Wests intentions.
Ideal would be as this resulted in political upheaval and a regime change by the Iranian people itself (perhaps with a little bit of covered help).
It should also send a clear message to the numerous other nations who want to gain a nuclear capacity (and probably have signed the Non-Proliveration Treaty).
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Konovalov
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Skybird
I am 66% sure that a certain ammount of socalled mini-nukes will be used along with conventional BBBs.
|
How did you come to 66%?... |
I think Skybird just took 1% of 100 and multiplied it with 66...
