View Single Post
Old 10-10-12, 01:26 AM   #10
Armistead
Rear Admiral
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: on the Dan
Posts: 10,880
Downloads: 364
Uploads: 0


Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by TorpX View Post
My comments are meant as more of a general observation, than as a personal complaint. I have not yet managed to finish the war, and don't have an encyclopedic memory of battles and campaigns, so RSRDC is ok for me. However, I know some have either read enough, or played enough to know the SH campaign too well, and a randomised campaign would be a great benefit for them, no?

No, but if I can ever finish a RFB-RSRDC, I want to try it.
I've played and studied it enough I can pretty much attack any group I want, but since it has so much traffic, often I'll just hunt in locations I don't know as well. However, I have added numerous sub hunter groups, ships and convoys that are more generic and use lots of loops.

TMO was fun for awhile, the convoys zig more, use more speed, loops, percentages, generics, so it changes things up.

Still, attacking a group, regardless of mods can become boring once you learn the AI, so I work more on harder settings. Many of the groups I added aren't historically correct, such as 6 elite escorts guarding one tanker or troopship.

Give TMO a try without RSRD.
Armistead is offline   Reply With Quote