View Single Post
Old 10-02-12, 06:53 PM   #3
soopaman2
Der Alte
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: New Jersey, USA
Posts: 3,316
Downloads: 61
Uploads: 0
Default

I would worry more about internal sabotage blowing one of these up before the sea levels.

I am all for nuclear, but safe, stiffly and neutrally regulated nuclear.

Hybrid reactors are the future, they can burn Uranium, and also the waste products we normally bury and have to guard for 100k years.

But you know Greenpeace, hippies, oil company lobbying...

We could never fully research it without beaurocracy, and red tape, due to how "dangerous" it is .

Until We can get that plasma reactor working in Europe nuclear is our best hope, I am a peak oil believer, and the videos from Wyoming and other places, of people lighting thier drinking water on fire is more than enough proof to me, that the oil companies are running short on profits. Fracking is a job creator though! Too bad tens of thousands need to drink bottled water because of it.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Joint_European_Torus

The future. Once we make it viable.

Remember, until that first graphite pile, nuclear was a pipe dream too...

We just need scientists to decide funding, than politicians who would rather buy a tank, or Joint Strike Fighter. (or outright pocket it)
__________________
If Hitler invaded Hell I would make at least a favourable reference to the devil in the House of Commons.

-Winston Churchill-

The most fascinating man in the world.

Last edited by soopaman2; 10-02-12 at 07:04 PM. Reason: I type too fast, and think too slow. damn I am dumb.
soopaman2 is offline   Reply With Quote