More Walrus-bashing in their forum, even when giving feedback on the "patch". Some say it cripples the game beyond reasonable playability.
They got told
month after month, and did nothing to fix it. A patch now - also does not fix it.
That reminds me of some ArmA patches where also occasionally "improvements to the AI" were listed in the readme. Just that I never was able to see the differences, with the exception of just one single patch for ArmA2 were there was a
small improvement indeed. And I think that patch was a community patch, wasn't it, no official BI patch.
I hereby formally and officially declare Carrier Command a KIA,
as far as my wallet is concerned. Will stop check it out and worry about a decision now. Such lousy policies should not be supported - by paying money for them.
Such stories really anger me. So self-repeating. So unnecessary. So disappointing. With every game of theirs, the same bull: AI broken. Obviously they are resistant to learning effects. Or they have learned that financially they get away with it.
P.S. First site-reviews of CC can already be found on the web. All that have been filed, point out the bad AI as well, and it makes the scores to drop. The reviews I read this morning, three of them, say the title is rich in good features - and gets too massively hampered by the bad AI - even by console standards.