Quote:
Originally Posted by Skybird
Your implications, and displayed attitude as to be concluded on by your arguments. Last be seen in right this thread. Save that lawyer trickery for other opportunities, I do not buy that.
See above.
I take you by your words, Takeda, and I go for the meaning they deliver. And different to what August and you recently tried on me, I do not even take yours out of context. I even still give you the benefit of doubt, though it is somewhat fading.
But Jim is right. It's a dead end at best here. Since it now shifts to a personal level, it can only become ugly.
Some years ago I repeatedly suggested to Neal that topics on religion and certain political things just should be banned, by forum rules. I suggested that even repeatedly. But noooo.... 
P.S. Just for the record: I did not start this thread. Like everybody in here, I reacted. No trigger - no reaction.  |
You are the one that has engaged in a logical fallacy (strawman variant), and so you are now enrolled in the Takeda School of Internet Discourse. You have been started on a simple 100-level course on the technique of argument, but you refuse to complete the assignment. Poor form.
No, instead of simple acknowledgement of the fact that you placed words in my mouth to alter the meaning of my posts, you prefer to slink away with your ball. You have no ground to stand upon in your claim of superiority.