Quote:
Originally Posted by mapuc
Whatever he have done, he HAD the right to a fair trail.(thereafter we eliminater him)
As a journalist wrote after his dead, now those 9/11 believes got new blood-why did they kill him, why didn't they captured him alive a.s.o
I guess, now that it have been "revealed" that he was unarmed, when he was killed, those truther got really good stuff to use in their debate.
I'm not 100 % truther but even I wunder why they had to kill him and not giving him the right to a fair trail.
Markus
|
It think it was pretty obvious, even under the "official" version, that the SEAL's mission was to terminate him with extreme prejudice. There was never any intention of taking him alive and that is fine by me.