Quote:
Originally Posted by August
I think the main reason is because the good judge isn't preparing for some potential long term danger but rather his plans are against a specific person in the very near future. To say that if he's reelected the President, is going to use UN troops against the residents of North Central Texas just begs for dismissal as the wishful thinking of a disturbed individual.
|
While I'm inclined to agree, I have to repeat - odds are that SOMETHING will set SOMETHING off at SOME point. So why not this?
Now I'm not saying, or even implying, that this judge is speaking of anything that is even remotely likely. What I AM saying is that, after we all high-five, dance, and pronounce the judge a moonbat we consider the possibilities of what could set such disastrous events in motion.
It's more fun that way.
