Isn't this "freedom of speech issue" angle of gay marriage just like people claiming its a "states rights issue" over racial segregation?
Quote:
|
They sure were not discussing the issue brought up in the original post were they?
|
The issue brought up in the opening post was a speech by an individual.
They discuss it directly and deal with the content .
Quote:
|
Nice way to try and backtrack. You accused me of sidetracking the thread.
|
But you have, you set yourself up spectacularly for a fall and have since then been trying to dodge your problems.
Quote:
|
You can disagree with my views, but accusing me of crap and saying I said stuff I haven't said here is really disappointing.
|
Well since you support a persons views on gay marriage and what they have said shouldn't you define which of the versions of biblical marriage you mean. That was all that is pointed out in post#4. If Carthy wants to spread his definition of marriage from a source then he had better specify which of the very different definitions in that source he means.
Lets face it, Carthy could very well be saying he supports slavery and rape and you are complaining that people are objecting to it.
The problem you have had Haplo is that you havn't been able to see what you are actually saying throughout this topic, your idealism and zealotry has left you blinded to the content of your own attempt at an arguement.
Your whole attempt even if you try to limit its scope fails for the single reason that has been repeated constantly throughout the topic and which you are completely unable to comprehend.
It begins with C and is not only totally natural and right as it is fully justifiable and easily understood but its also patently obvious.
Yet you simply don't understand or see it.