View Single Post
Old 07-19-12, 08:14 PM   #7
Rockin Robbins
Navy Seal
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: DeLand, FL
Posts: 8,900
Downloads: 135
Uploads: 52


Default

Had a detonation occurred, there would still be incontrovertible evidence in the form of radioactive isotopes that could be recovered and traced to an atomic explosion at the site. There would be evidence on Google Earth of a crater made by such an explosion. So let's look together!

At 41:13 finally and reluctantly the video spills the beans on the location of the island where the explosion took place, but fails (of course) to name the island. Let's search.



Here's the entire Hungnam area. Supposedly this factory thing was in Hungnam and we can clearly see that there is a city there. One point for the "documentary." Sometimes they make up entire cities you know....

Now the unnamed island off Hungnam. Well there are three candidates, all south of the city being pointed at by that bright sand beach. These are the only islands off Hungnam so we can be absolutely sure one of these, if there was an explosion, is where it took place. You can see the three, all together with the largest on the bottom and the next two to the NNE.



Here are the largest two. You can't see any craters, but what you can see is very telling: they are both inhabited! The southern one has a great big AAA installation marked by the letter I in the middle. These two islands are totally unscarred by any nuclear explosion, that's for sure.





Then we have this little island to the NNE, largest dimension about 100 yards. It's a rocky island that would preserve any evidence of a devastating nuclear explosion and there is no doubt that here there was none.

No other islands are off Hungnam. We just came up dry and can state with confidence no explosions took place here. It's amazing that a fake nuclear explosion preceded the North Korean nuclear un-explosion of a couple of years ago.

Had a nuclear explosion actually taken place you KNOW we would have had submarines with commandos land, take samples, bring them back to the US or even test them aboard the submarines to confirm or debunk such a thing. Had that happened, there are no secrets that keep long, just look at all the other revelations that come out.

Suppose we compare a US test site, Danny Boy, where in 1962, on the surface, we exploded a small 430 ton, that's .43 kiloton, device to study the effects of nuclear bombardment on solid basalt. Slide, please!


Nice crater produced with diameter 265 feet, depth 84 feet! Clear evidence remains after fifty years. I'd say this case is absolutely closed. Note that no habitation of human activity is nearby. There's a reason for that...

Plenty of smoke here. But when you clear that away it conceals nothing. No nuclear explosion here. Move along folks....

Last edited by Rockin Robbins; 07-19-12 at 08:47 PM.
Rockin Robbins is offline   Reply With Quote