Quote:
|
Not in his original post. He didn't mention Islam until after the attacks started.
|
First line, first post.
Quote:
|
Again after the attacks started.
|
Third line, first post.
Quote:
|
In his original post.....
|
Done.
Quote:
|
Because it gives you an excuse to go on the attack again. You didn't like the link itself, just that he used it.
|
I like the link because firstly it is a regular dodgy source, secondly it manages to convey just what it wants, thirdly it manages to link to the real information which shows it to be a dodgy source and pushing its own agenda while kindly supplying the information it is twisting.
It means it is easier to get to both the actual issue and to the issue as it is being portrayed.
Quote:
|
In a discussion nothing is ever self-evident.
|
They are when the claims are self refuting.
Quote:
|
Fair enough, but you need to actually talk about it rather than this constant sniping.
|
Let me clarify that further.
Neo nazis "ideas" and their Jewish conspiracies are mainly seen as a sad pathetic joke by just about everyone who isn't a neo nazi.
Rabid islamophobes with their combination of half truths distortions and outright fabrications are often able to sound quite credible until you actuallty examine them which is why their claims should be challenged more strongly than the rantings of some crazy white supremacists.
Their agenda I would probably put on par with the hate filled muslim fundamentalists and their crazy ideas.
But with the slight exception that the crazy muslims fundys (despite the silly eurabia conspiracy theory some rabid islamophobes spout) have no chance of gaining any actual influence in europe, while the rabid make it up as they go along islamophobes are actually having an influence on western society and western politics, which really makes them more dangerous to europe than the backwards wahibis.
Quote:
|
No, and in some ways I agree with you.
|
And on some things I agree with him.
But two examples of subjects spring to mind
On Islam I don't agree as he constantly repeats the same rubbish long after it has been shown as untue.
On the EU I would agree with much of his gist but draw the line in that he simply makes up "facts" and insists they are true, and even worse he makes up "facts" when the truth is more than enough to thoroughly do the job.