View Single Post
Old 07-18-12, 06:22 AM   #159
Skybird
Soaring
 
Skybird's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: the mental asylum named Germany
Posts: 42,806
Downloads: 10
Uploads: 0


Default

Oh, and this: the big Vogue of doing it thjat has been seen in the Us in recent decades, seems to be over, too. Numbers are in sharp decline. Note en passant, from the first German essay I linked: when it got introduced in the US, that was just 150 years ago - and the main argument was to prevent boys from masturbating. To prevent blindness and early mental retarding, you see.

http://www.examiner.com/article/circ...-to-33-percent
Quote:
According to the CDC rates of circumcision performed on newborn males in the U.S. declined sharply from 56 percent in 2006 to just 33 percent in 2009. The decision to circumcise a newborn so that he will fit in with peers in the locker room is no longer valid.


Circumcision in the U.S. has been a controversial and hot button topic for years. Circumcision rates in 1970 were almost 90 percent. The credit for this incredible decline might be due to the ever increasing number of parents who are educating themselves about this unnecessary cosmetic procedure before making a choice.


No national health organization in the world recommends circumcision for healthy male infants, not the American Academy of Pediatrics or the American Medical Association. Nearly all European males are intact, with no epidemic of penile health problems, thus discrediting the American held believe that circumcision is healthy.


Another myth is that circumcision removes just a little flap of skin. The truth is that roughly 15 square inches of tissue is removed, amounting to anywhere from one-third to one-half of the skin covering a normal penis. Removed with this tissue are 240 feet of nerves and up to 20,000 nerve endings.


Activists spreading the word about circumcision call themselves intactivists. Their argument is that an intact penis is the default and natural condition. Don***8217;t fix it if it ain***8217;t broken. Risks and side effects can include hemorrhage and even death. The foreskin that is removed actually has a function.


Another argument against routine newborn circumcision is consent. An infant can***8217;t give it. It***8217;s his body; he should make the decision when he***8217;s older. Some circumcised men have even opted for foreskin restoration.


Many organizations have come out against routine infant circumcision. Just a few of which are: Doctors Opposing Circumcision, Mothers Against Circumcision and even Jews Against Circumcision.
__________________
If you feel nuts, consult an expert.
Skybird is offline   Reply With Quote