Quote:
|
It is not as rnadom as yiou claim it to be. First, the Quran is filled with contradicting lines, these derive - for the vast majority - from the fact of different times of origin when what Muhammad said the passage in question. This has never stopped both fundamentalist mainstream and the so-called moderate islam that you think exists from proceeding thoruhg history ion the fundamentalist manner. This may be becasue of another fact, that is that the socalled abrogation principle gained consensus amongst all major Muslim juristzic schools and lineages already in 9th or 10th century. It says that in case of contradiction between two quotes from different passages of the Quran, the one that has been given later (was created later and thus is newer) should be given superiority over the older one. Muhammad turned the more violent and aggressive the elder he becam and the more successful his conquest was running. So do the math and add 1 and 1 together. Most violent passages in the Quran are the later ones. They thus have dominance over older quotes.
|
Right.
Quote:
|
The whole book is, like the bible a confused collection of contradictions and a bullride through the timeline, because the Suras are nbot sorted in chronological order, but by length.
|
So skybird just trashed his own arguement and then topped it by repeating some of his bull that was totally trashed before
"I has looked briefly at a german translation and some bits at a rough count looked longer than others sort of so ya I is right as i had written for many years this"
Quote:
|
In case of doubt, judge it by the histoic record of deed, act and behavior.
|
crazy man, absolutely far out crazy.
If in doubt about a text you look at the text.