@AVG
Quote:
|
In correct. He was instructed to guard a particular area. He is trained to save lives. Saving a life does not know any perimeters that I'm aware of.
|
Being a lifeguard does have parameters, perhaps you should be aware of that as that is the reason he got fired.
Quote:
|
I'll say it again Tribesman. He was damned if he did and damned if he didn't.
|
Goes with the job.
Don't like rule#1 then don't take the job.
Quote:
|
If he sat and did nothing while the swimmer drowned you would probably believe he was a lout and should have performed his lifesaving despite company policy. Fire him for his inaction!
|
Do you notice something about the people who take the same view as me on this?
@Tak
No, accuracy.
Quote:
|
He did what should have been done.
|
Not as a lifeguard.
Quote:
|
So I will take that as, you would have stood by.
|
Interesting, what do you base that nonsense on?
Re read your post#11 and look at the two important words which are dealt with in post#13
Quote:
|
Unfortunately, you would now be liable for prosecution for having done nothing.
|
On what possible basis?
Quote:
|
He did administer aid, at least according to the article.
|
According to him in the article? according to him he was saving lives? according to one article he also rescued the person from the sea?
Quote:
|
I wasn't there. I only told you what the article said. You should consider asking that lifeguard.
|
I had already pointed out that some of the articles are telling very different stories and the lifeguard iseems to be telling different stories.
If I was to consider asking any of those lifeguards anything I would ask to other two that got fired if they can remember their training and would like to think again before they gave their answer or go through a refresher course to get re certified for the job.