Quote:
|
Someone with a documentable history of hostility to those of faith continues that pattern
|
The only "hostility" is the writings of those of "faith", especially those that make ridiculous claims about the scripture they claim to follow.
There is no hostility at all to people of faith or to people of no faith.
Quote:
|
along with hurling a personal insult regarding someone's sexuality in their following post
|
It addresses the issue.
It is widely held that the more someone screams about queens the greater the chance is that they are rather partial themselves.
Would you like a big list of very vocal homophobes who turned out to be taking deliveries by the back door?
Quote:
|
I guess some things are not hate speech when the "target" is equally hateful and despicable.
|
Well done, almost correct.
Calling a nazi a nazi isn't hate speech, calling a Klansman a racist "christian" isn't hate speech, calling a black supremacist a dumb bigot isn't hate speech, it is addressing their views.
Quote:
|
The KKK is pretty despicable too - so I guess we can say anything we want about that group as well?
|
You can call them racist scum, extreme right wing or bigots, but I don't think you can call them liberals
Quote:
|
Where do you draw the line on what "group" its acceptable to make blanket, generalized hateful comments about?
|
That is simple, a statement about "christians" isn't a generalised statement about Christians any more than a statement about white supremacists is a generlised statement about "white" people.
Quote:
|
I don't agree with "identity christians".
|
Good, becuase I wouldn't want you to follow the trail from NC to the great northwest homeland for "white" "christian" aryan folk based on the principles of the founding fathers and true to the US constitution free of "jews, ******s, race traitors and other degenerates"........call em like you see em.
@Mods. If any words of that last neo nazi hate speech is deemed unnaceptable despite the context please censor them.