Quote:
Now why would I pretend the male perpetrators of the
boys be anything but homosexuals?
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by MH
You could pretend that they are homosexuals and not pedophiles to prove your point...still i guess that not every person above 18 who has sex with someone under 18 is pedophile.It may be a fluid situation in reality but black&white by law sometimes.
I guess that when such a case occurs with homosexual couple we might have a bit skewed view and jump to some conclusions.
|
I can see why names that classify criminal behavior is necessary in the law.
But to then use these names to give order to chaos which is sexual perversion,
is worse then misleading. It gives the false sense that there are
hard boundaries and a false sense of predictability. And plays a role that
predators use to win trust. As with Sandusky, everything about this guy
was a lie. How could this guy deceive so many for so long with so many victims?
I think the time to rethink this entire area of human behavior is over due.
To few have had to much power to make decisions that produced to many
truly innocent victims and yet are still considered experts.
ZeeWolf