Mapuc, it is quite simple, it is a combination of the article and the source and the sources source which gives the response.
For example if you post some prison planet article which uses Jones as the only source apart from a youtube link from a similar nut then it gets treated like it is, if you post some RT article that says Putin is the greatest and evil America is scheming with dr. evil to collapse western civilisation then it gets treated as Putins crap propoganda from the Kremlin.
If you post mr holistics miracle cures nuclear scares story then it gets treated for what it is.
The very fact that you mention FEMA shows how you really do have a habit of swallowing every crap story your mates send you off the internet
Quote:
|
I know that most of you would make fun of this, not the article, but the newspaper behind the article.
|
Look, if the source of the story says oops the system went bad while I was asleep and gave a funny reading it doesn't say much for the article does it.
Moreover when that source carries a disclaimer about the accuracy of instruments and sofware it is selling and the results they give then it shows mr. holistic miracles isn't even looking at his own sources.