Quote:
Originally Posted by Sailor Steve
No, the answer is 'N-E-V-E-R' (just a little melodramatic there) because the NTSB's job is to determine the exact cause of the crash. In this case the cause was obvious, and the film is there for all to see exactly why the planes crashed.
|
Well if you read carefully you would see that I was using the NTSB as an example. I was talking about the speculation over building collapes, rather than the plane crashes.
I appreciate that NTSBs job would have been near impossible in the case of the WTC crashes as the subsequent collapes reduced all (but the buildings stuctural steel) in to peices small enough to hold in the palm of your hand or smaller.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sailor Steve
There was no wreckage to examine because the aluminum planes plowed head-on into buildings made of steel, and were vaporized by the impact and subsequent fireballs. Any possible surviving wreckage fell hundreds of feet to the ground, pulverized inside thousands of tons of falling steel.
That is the reason there was no investigation into the crashes, because there was nothing left to investigate.
|
Well, metal doesnt 'vapourise' but that doesnt really matter - in the case of WTC I was talking about the stuctural failure buildings, all the stuctural steal was still sitting there.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sailor Steve
You really are reaching here, in an effort to prove that there has to have been a conspiracy.
|
Sorry? Where did i say 9/11
has to have be a conspiricy? Is there a rule some where that says we must conform to one of two sides in every argument?
There are conspiricy theories for everything, most of which are just misinterpretations by ecentric people. But for 9/11 there is a bit more than that, You also have fire fighters from the scene, Architects and even Pentagon officials disputing some aspect or another of official story, while thats is
not proof or disproof of anything, it suggests (to me at least) that the offical conclusion might not exacly be as water tight as one would hope for something like 9/11.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sailor Steve
You've shown nothing so far, try as you might to convince everyone.
|
I never really expected to convince anyone of anything, its quite hard to do when im not overly convinced of anything in particular myself
I am saying what I think and why, but I am not insisting that you or anyone else must agree with it.
So that sounds rather more like you are trying to pin conspiricy bage to my shirt, possibly because you assume that if have doubts on the offical story -that conspiricy is only other conceivable place that I must be coming from. Wrong, If the question is 'what exactly happened on 9/11, then my answer is: 'I dont know and I wouldnt like to guess. Because If said I did know I might have to be jumping the gun.