Quote:
Originally Posted by HunterICX
The sooner that whole gimmick of 3D dies out the better.
imo it adds nothing to the movie...nothing.
HunterICX
|
+2
Plus it does damage. Becasue screenplay writers and directors alike easily can fall in the trap to arrange the story told so that it focusses around the 3D effects, leading from one 3D gimmick scene to the next, but lacking in what should combine various stages of a movie and actually combines into a narrative, an actual story told. Straining after 3D effects. This kiund of visual sensationalism is what already Star Wars got accused of since the 80s, and there is some truth in it - Lucas is no great narrator or story teller, is he, his movies live by special effects in overkill dose. With 3D, it all just get pushed to the next level. That's why I think 3D movies should not be shown in cinemas, but on fairgrounds, just beside the big monster swing or the rollercoaster.
We may end up where the pop music is today: it gets composed for the most so that it can easily be transformed into a cellphone jungle, and the prinmciples of cellphone jingles feed back on composing pop music. The result is a noisy, infantile sequence of sounds and tones, and plenty of untalented baby faces at casting shows hectically acting out hysterical, artifical plastic-emotions.