View Single Post
Old 04-12-12, 01:19 PM   #8
Skybird
Soaring
 
Skybird's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: the mental asylum named Germany
Posts: 42,783
Downloads: 10
Uploads: 0


Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by CCIP View Post
So what about relationships between disabled people, or women having children after 35? Both are scientifically more likely to produce birth defects than incest.
The risks latently add from generation to generation of incestous relations. That'S why the isolated incestous village crowd in some god-forsaken place from some point on sees an explosion of immune defects and genetic vulnerabilities and deficits, if the population is too small to stirr the gene pool sufficiently.

But must we really go to extremes here to just relativise incestous behaviour? Must we really try to make incestous relations look the same as births given by mothers above 35 years? I think there still is a tremendous and extremely big difference.

I hope you do not seriously demand an explanation on that now. An ordinary couple having a baby with the mother being 37 is one thing. An incest relation resulting in babies is somethign totally different.
__________________
If you feel nuts, consult an expert.
Skybird is offline   Reply With Quote