Quote:
Originally Posted by August
Yeah I suppose it was but i'm kind of fed up with people trying to tell me what relationship I can or can't have with God, especially when it's a know it all like him.
|
Actually I would prefer to be a "know it all" than to be a "know nothing, stay ignorrant and be proud of it" like you.
Actually I repeatedly said in the past that I know that I do not know many things. What I did here, and what you completely ignored, was that I just reported delivered content from science and several cultural traditions - points that you did not care to adress in any way.
What I also did was trying to explain that the very design of our thinking and mind prohibits us from gaining any insight and knowledge that our design does not allow us to form, since our design is limted in reach and format and thus cannot embrace the unlimited. We need to seize to exist as separate entities to become one with all and thus realise the "all". I showed that this is a knowedge that is being delivered in Christian and Buddhist traditions since centuries and millenia.
It is your fantasy, your twiosted mind only, that I told you what
relationship you have with your deity. I nowhere did. I just explained that as a fact ALL thinking and all intellectual activity by the ego is based on the structure of the languages we speak, and that this is established scientific consensus today, since longer time. I indicate that certain branches and schools in ohilosophy see it like this, too. Putting anything else into my mouth on what I should have said about your relation to your deity you happen to belive in, is your imagination only - not my real record of what I said.
You also owe an apology to those members on this board who currently have jobs or had jobs that by their social or public respectability or reputation maybe compare to being employed in a warehouse like I was, or doing work with an even lower reputation value, as seen by the Zeitgeist. Your repeated comments on my old warehouse job - you repeat that stabbing since years, don't you - by which you hope to hurt me, implies that you look down on the
primitives, the
failed existences, the
socially lower beings or
poor dogs doing such work in a warehouse. If it were not like this, why trying to hurt me by refering to this past job of mine? You even admitted above, to M.H. I think, that you acted cheap. Since we have members also working as salesmen, cashiers, as truck drivers, in factories or doing their daily tour with the garbage disposal service, you offended all them too when you tried to offend me over this one job I once had. Because you illustrate by that that you see a reason that allows you to look down on people being in such jobs.
And that is your disgrace. Not mine, and nobody else's.