[MH]

Originally Posted by Tribesman

indeed he did, he also said it wouldn't work.

What would not work?

Originally Posted by Tribesman

indeed
It is to illustrate a pattern in your responses, much like some here get a red white and blue mist obscuring their vision and rationality when it is their nations policies involved.
That is why I always like to use Israeli sources when I know you you are going to try and take issue with the subject instead of actually addressing it

Lol...i still don't know what is the argument about...

All i have said in this thread are some reasons that i think Iran should not have nukes.
Some quote...

Dagan: An attack on Iran before you are exploring all other approaches is not the right way how to do it.

Stahl: If they're that rational as you suggest and that logical, then why can't you, Israel, and the world live with a nuclear Iran?

Dagan: In the Israeli case, they have said they want to destroy Israel.

He says one sign of Iran's logical thinking is how they cunningly stall through diplomacy.

Dagan: I think that the Iranians are masters at negotiation. They invented of what I call the "bazaar culture" of how we are negotiating.

Stahl: So if there are negotiations, how concerned would you be that the Europeans, for example, would say, "Ah. We're talking. Let's weaken the sanctions"?

Dagan: I have to admit that's a concern. Yes.

Stahl: People are going to want to lessen the tension so that the oil prices will go back down.

Dagan: Do you think that Iran armed with a nuclear capability is going to create stability in the region? They have an interest, a basic interest to raise the prices of oil, cause this is the most important source of income for Iran. If Iran will be armed with a nuclear capability, their ability to create instability in the region, and by this indirectly to increase the price of oil, that'd be much worse than it is now.

What is the reason for a war against Iran?

Requires only one word...

Israel.

Wouldn't that be good reason?



.....