[Onkel Neal]

It's about this:
"No person shall be held to answer for a capital, or otherwise infamous crime, unless on a presentment or indictment of a Grand Jury, except in cases arising in the land or naval forces, or in the Militia, when in actual service in time of War or public danger; nor shall any person be subject for the same offence to be twice put in jeopardy of life or limb; nor shall be compelled in any criminal case to be a witness against himself, nor be deprived of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor shall private property be taken for public use, without just compensation."

From a socialist newspaper,

"To which distant planet suddenly vanished the deep sense of lawfulness and morality liberals displayed during the Bush administration’s tenure?"

http://communities.washingtontimes.c...n-us-citizens/

and the right

George W. Bush or Dick Cheney, however, should not hold their breath for an apology from the administration and party that demonized these same security policies on the campaign trail. Nowhere does Mr. Holder reject the antiwar left's conjured claims of constitutional violations and distortions of facts about Guantanamo Bay or the Afghanistan and Iraq wars. Nor does he credit the Bush administration for laying the foundations for the amazing quick-strike capability that has provided Mr. Obama with his only victories in the war on terror.

http://online.wsj.com/article/SB1000...googlenews_wsj

Has this been discussed here? Isn't it odd that the media have not been all over Obama over this? Jon Stewart agrees with me.