Thread: WinRAR or 7z?
View Single Post
Old 03-10-12, 04:21 PM   #11
DelphiUniverse
中国水兵
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Scapa Flow, underneath a ferry
Posts: 272
Downloads: 125
Uploads: 0
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Sailor Steve View Post
He didn't ask about Winzip, he asked about 7zip, which is far better than either "Win". After I discovered 7zip I threw out all five other programs I had been using, including WinRar.
I desided to make a test using the latest of all programs. Latest winzip (v16), latest Winrar (v4.11) and latest 7zip (v9.20)

I compressed a full game of almost 400 MB of mixed data, video, pictures, music files. Here is the result:

7zip: 130 seconds and compressed size became 367,677 kB
WinRAR: 116 seconds and compressed size became 368,461 kB
Winzip: 79 seconds and compressed size became 365,153 kB

All programs used the best compression available.

The latest winzip beat the crap out of 7zip and winrar in terms of time and it is also smaller.

WinRar beat 7zip in terms of speed by a relatively good margin and had just a little bit extra size, nothing that will matter.

7zip had the longest compression time.

7zip compressed 2,896,160 bytes of data per second
WinRar compressed 3,252,614 bytes of data per second
Winzip compressed 4,733,117 bytes of data per second



winzip spent about 40% less time versus 7zip. If you compress 10 GB of data using 7zip and we imagine it will take an hour to do so, then winzip will spend 36 minutes to do the same, thats how serious it becomes when dealing with huge amounts of data.
DelphiUniverse is offline   Reply With Quote