Quote:
Originally Posted by Tribesman
Thats the point, there isn't really an "accepted" version and it is never stable as it is always evolving and there is always new information coming to light.
Take for an example the AVG, I think it was during Clintons time that they finally got there full service period recognised and got all their dues that were owed.
?
|
Wow
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tribesman
Does that recognition that they were at all times serving US military personel working for the US government mean that the US was really at war with the Empire of Japan in China before Pearl?
|
So what is your point at pointing out the obvious technical details here?
You really disappoint me here.
So was USA engaged in Battle of Britain or Russia in Spanish civil war vs Germany?
So History is complex and some relations and definition can be fluid and disputed.
Question is if the points you brought up are worth it anyway because they can be covered in discussing relations between given countries at that time.
This again bring us to the point that history is fluid in interpretation....try not to bring settler to the subject.
My point is that its very nice that you use your head but you also need to know how far you want to go with your mental exercises.
History wise it depends what point you try to prove.
.............