One can discuss hyperbolic statements, doing so is generally fun since they back the speaker into a corner but there is no discussion where there is dogma and religion is all about the dogmatic.
Am disappointed that you cannot tell the difference between critiquing the argument and attacking the arguer. Had honestly expected something better. Go ahead and slam the door on the way out if it makes you feel good about yourself.
@CCIP
I assume that's aimed at me but if you would like to point out where I have been dogmatic, I would appreciate specifics rather than generalizations.
It is not dogma to demand proof and I make no claims at having all the answers.
|