First my apology that I missed this part of your response: "as he never fitted the bill". I reviewed my post but you were fast enough to respond to my flawed response.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tribesman
Yes, and they argue about those cases they think are unfair, like..... people being fired for being a woman, people being fired for not being a woman, people not being fired for being a woman and people not being fired for not being a woman.
|
I have not read most articles by Mr. MacDonald and his colleagues. I have read only that one in first post and with less extensively that one from where that picture is from. Most of information what I have about Ms. Graf is from other sources. I don't agree with all they write I only linked them there as I thought it being best to give people as many sources as possible to let them make their own conclusions.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tribesman
Like I said two of your links are shared sources and both use a third source(in addition to the two military sources which all three dispute).
|
I originally posted four links. Did you forget one of them or am I misunderstanding you?
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tribesman
I do like MacDonalds take on the child sex one...come on give the chaplain a break, he has a drink problem and had been in afghanistan, he was only jerking off on camera to a supposed 14 year old its not like they had real sex, what is it with these wild dog JAGs? who among us can cast the first stone? what about his poor wife and kids while he is in prison? 
nice opinions eh, do you agree with their take on "unjust" cases? |
I'm not familiar with those cases nor have I read those articles so I don't start arguing about them.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tribesman
I see you picked up on the difference after you wrote your piece, quite a coincidence really as "doctor" was going to be the example I used if you tried to defend his performance as a lawyer.
|
That part was based on my quite impressively massive misreading of your response.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tribesman
No when someone links to a site like two of those four that I absolutely refuse to read any of it as it may make me laugh too much, instead I prefer to guess at what they say and guess at any links between Keating MacDonald and Syneeda then simply make stuff up about what I think they write as no-one would be posting a link to their writings to prove me wrong 
It does raise the question though, did you actually read those links you are posting?
I mean seriously didn't the truther and other conspiracy nut links set the alarms ringing? |
...and that question where you answered here was more directed toward that article about Col. Murphy which I assumed you hadn't read due my misreading of your response. My apologies for that. But about your response... Thank you for your opinion. I personally favour to not comment at all if I don't read articles, in my opinion guessing is not very good way to go in discussion on sources.
That "truther" and "nutter" thing... that would set alarm bells ringing would they be only ones publishing this kind of opinion. However they are not (feel free to Google if you are ready to really read) though they tend to express their opinion in more restrained manner.
EDIT: Tribesman, we should propably figure out somekind responding/editing turn order system...