Kraznyi.
Quote:
|
Are you really seriously telling to me that that this is "business as usual"? If so then evidence please.
|
Look at the pile of cases in your provided links(OK avoid the real crazy link as people are getting the same treatment because of who they are and who thay are not and what they did and what they didn't and because the people are this that and the other or all three at once while being neither while the other people are this that and the other too
)...which means you have already provided all the "business as usual" evidence you could possibly require.
Quote:
|
If you mean process after relieving her from command then I agree that its possible (check case below). Otherwise, no.
|
As I said check out any of the others, or as you "check below" provide one that is even more drawn out and goes on for decades then I must ask how you can possibly say "Otherwise, no" at all?
Quote:
|
Demotion and determination of retirement rank are not same thing. Retirement rank is (as said before) determined by what was the last rank where person performed satisfactorily. Here is example:
|
Look at your examples, he was never able to perform satisfactorily in the job he was assigned as he never fitted the bill so he goes out with the same rank he had when he got the job he couldn't perform, she however was able to perform satisfactorily on every occasion when she wasn't screwing up.