[Skybird]

Defending white policies of apartheid against blacks, has no point indeed.

Defending specially protected status of heterosexual marraiges, has.

Vital biological interests of a civilisdation are not an object of just chnaging attiotudes and "conceptualizations". They are vital factors that decide about extinction or survival.

And us hetero-sexual singles, who would be discriminated when our status compared to homo couples get marginalised although homo couples do not serve anything more valuable for the community than us singles - we still wait for anybody explaining why it is okay to equal homo sexual couples to hetereo marriages, but singles not.

Men tic different than women. They are not better or worse, they are different. Homos and Heteros have non-equal importances for a communal life and its interest to secure its future - by breeding. A homosexual society - would die within one generation. Because it would not have enough babies, if any at all. Especially when it were a tribe 20.000 years ago, when there were noi genetic science and laboratories to artifically create what nature had denied to homo couples.

It amazes me time and again how far people are willing to go in limiting limit their reasonable thinking and to change the meaning of words - just to appear as politically correct. Must be some Rudel-mentality.

I am not discriminating gays. I am willing to give and accept them as many rights (and responsibilities) as I claim for myself. - BUT NOT MORE. Families, children, and thus the institution of hetero marriages, is more important than them, or me.

This may not be politically correct for the confused mind. But it is right. And that is what counts.