By Avon Lady:
Yes madam!We will cut our sentences as you wish.Syntax has no meaning.
Quote:
|
Again, please clarify what was illegal?
|
In most democracies that i know,there is required judicial approval to intercept comunications of citizens.This seems to be the case in USA too:
American law usually requires a secret court, known as a Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court, to give permission before intelligence officers can conduct surveillance on US soil.
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/americas/4538286.stm
If Bush decides to bypass courts by giving the orders,i think that's why this news finished in the first page of all newspapers worldwide.If it was all normal what's all the fuss about it?And i repeat again.If Bush was doing nothing wrong on chosing who to spy,why didn't he follow the normal procedure of getting the judges to do their job?
Quote:
|
But let's assume so for argument's sake and continue.....
|
You will forgive me,but i don't continue a dialogue with people that either don't know syntax or try to manipulate a text to their pleasure in order to facilitate their positions.
I also think that your replies show clearly you are quite biased in certain matters that have to do with Islam and Israel.
So i remain in my Utopia and leave you in your safe heaven.
Regards
P.S:Americans : You can start building the security fence.And Bush will choose who is to be left out
