Basically, it's all about whether you think George Bush in an honest and trustworthy individual. If the answer is definate "YES" than you need not to worry about this, as the law is intended to keep you safe from those who wish to do harm.
If the answer is 'NO' than there is a bit problem, because a person who's a decieving liar can use the 'terrorism' clause to spy on eveyryone, on big corporations, and so on and on, and do justice as they please; and when matters become of public record their answer will be the same: we are doing this to protect you and we already prevented many attacks.
It's very tough. Apparently half of the US voted for BUSH precisely because they viewed him as a moral human being, while the other half not necessarily questioned his morality - it was his competency they weren't happy about. So I reckon it's not all that awful and that he's a good person at the end of the day, only if misguided by his warmonging members of the adminstrations. I hope he indeed holds up to his democracy principles. Otherwise, there's no hope. 2008 election candidates at this stage all look hoaky. May be Baroc O'Bama for president? The guy can talk...
|